Viewing abuse filter 1: Large deletion from article by new editors

Editing filter 1

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	1
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 397 actions, this filter has matched 0 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.89 ms, and it consumes 1.5 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:	!"autoconfirmed" in user_groups & new_size >= 50 & page_namespace == 0 & edit_delta < -5000 & !user_name in page_recent_contributors & !"#redirect" in lcase(added_lines) & !(lcase(summary) rlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t") & length(summary) < 60 & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(added_lines) < 3000 !"autoconfirmed" in user_groups & new_size >= 50 & page_namespace == 0 & edit_delta < -5000 & !user_name in page_recent_contributors & !"#redirect" in lcase(added_lines) & !(lcase(summary) rlike "\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\brv[vt]?\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\brmv?\b\|\brepea?t") & length(summary) < 60 & rcount("\n[\|!<]",removed_lines) / (rcount("\n",removed_lines) + 1) < 0.9 & length(added_lines) < 3000
Notes:	fixing the part about recent contributor.. <nixeagle> No, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight Restoring Prodego's edit. - DF Thanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego Changed from "new editor" to "non-autoconfirmed editor" for clarity. -xeno optimizing - Hersfold I increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0 Fixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold exception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen NO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego Increased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik Closed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF Added action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin Imported on English Wikivoyage on 2013-01-16 ~snowolf fix syntax --SHB2000 14 Nov 2024
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	22:15, 13 November 2024 by SHB2000 (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"!\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups\r\n\u0026 new_size \u003E= 50\r\n\u0026 page_namespace == 0\r\n\u0026 edit_delta \u003C -5000\r\n\u0026 !user_name in page_recent_contributors \r\n\u0026 !\"#redirect\" in lcase(added_lines)\r\n\u0026 !(lcase(summary) rlike \"\\bcop(y\|ied)\|und(id\|o)\|\\brv[vt]?\\b\|revert\|vandal\|remov\|clean\|delet\|\\brmv?\\b\|\\brepea?t\")\r\n\u0026 length(summary) \u003C 60\r\n\u0026 rcount(\"\\n[\|!\u003C]\",removed_lines) / (rcount(\"\\n\",removed_lines) + 1) \u003C 0.9\r\n\u0026 length(added_lines) \u003C 3000","name":"Large deletion from article by new editors","comments":"fixing the part about recent contributor.. \u003Cnixeagle\u003E\r\n\r\nNo, that was the intended logic, to test whether the user is The Only contributor. Putting that back. Deleting from a page you created should be fine, but blanking from an established page just because you edited it previously generally would not be. - Dragons_flight\r\n\r\nRestoring Prodego's edit. - DF\r\nThanks for the talk page note DF / Don't trip if it is a full blank, overlaps with filter 3 -Prodego\r\n\r\nChanged from \"new editor\" to \"non-autoconfirmed editor\" for clarity. -xeno\r\n\r\noptimizing - Hersfold\r\n\r\nI increased the threshold to -2000 to decrease the number of hits - Ruslik0\r\n\r\nFixing the recent contributors thing; this is a string of up to ten users, so != doesn't work. - hersfold\r\n\r\nexception for 69.226.103.13 - Cen\r\n\r\nNO! Do not exempt particular IPs, its a waste of checks. If they want exemption, they can create an account. Its free -Prodego\r\n\r\nIncreased threshold to 5000. - Ruslik\r\nClosed gap between filter 3 and filter 30 - previously could reduce articles to exactly 50 without triggering. RF\r\n\r\nAdded action check, so it'll stop pinging on AFT comments. - rsterbin\r\n\r\nImported on English Wikivoyage on 2013-01-16 ~snowolf\r\n\r\nfix syntax --SHB2000 14 Nov 2024","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["blanking"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["blanking"]}}