Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

• Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.

Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.

• Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.

• Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.

• Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.

• Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.

• Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.

• Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
  • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
  • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
  • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

• Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.

• Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.

• Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.

• Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

• Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.

• Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.

• Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.

• Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.

• Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.

• Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.

• Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.

Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.

• Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.

Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.

Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

• {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
• {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
• {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
• {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
• {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
• {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

• {{Keep}}  Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
• {{Delist}}  Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:

In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

• Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
• Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
• Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
   oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
   1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
   2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

• Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
• Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
• Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
• Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

• Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder
• Kritiken von Fotografien

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2025 at 15:35:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
•  Info created and uploaded by Byrdyak – nominated by Kelly zhrm -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Unconvinced the documentation is at FP level, although the picture certainly is. 'Three zebra' seems a very bare-bones title, and 'unidentified subspecies' in the categories doesn't give me much confidence (and the picture is also categorised with a specific subspecies - which is it? Do we know the subspecies or don't we? Unfortunately this is just the kind of thing the short lived checklist was designed to point out... Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2025 at 14:11:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cymatiidae
•  Info Gyrineum roseum is a small but beautiful representative of the Cymatiidae, the Rock whelks; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Outstanding, as always - I could spend a while browsing your shell pictures for fun. Cmao20 (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support. Wow! JayCubby (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2025 at 01:46:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice abstract forms. But I can see some purple CA at full size. Not a deal breaker but it would be good if it can be removed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your review. Much appreciated. I uploaded a new version last night (in the first version I didn't correct for CA) – please check and let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to do. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2025 at 01:43:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
•  Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very interesting building, nice colours, skilful perspective/detail, good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Question - @Frank Schulenburg: Do you have photos of the interior of the church? From my reading - there are 1500 of the pictured small windows with stained glass inserts, which create a beautiful, colorful light play in the sanctuary. - ERcheck (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2025 at 20:43:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Plants
•  Info created by Henri Matisse, digitized by Google, uploaded and nominated by Yann
•  Info Bowl of Apples on a Table, Henri Matisse, oil on canvas, 1916. 89.5 × 114.9 cm
•  Support Public domain since last January. No FP by Matisse yet. Only one FP of still-life paintings. Very high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment The description page should better use the {{Artwork}} template instead of the plain {{Information}} template. The collection should be mentioned not only via a category, but also in the description. There are no categories for the subject of the painting; at least Category:20th-century still-life paintings of fruit bowls, Category:Still-life paintings with apples and Category:Paintings of tables should be added, or whatever you consider as appropriate. From a more formal perspective, Category:1916 still-life paintings and Category:Paintings by Henri Matisse in the United States would be useful. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2025 at 18:19:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Perciformes (Perch-like Fishes)
•  Info Moorish idol (Zanclus cornutus), Anilao, Philippines. It can be found from the eastern coast of Africa between Somalia and South Africa east to Hawaii and Easter Island. The Moorish idol lives between depths of 1–180 metres (3.3–590.6 ft) in turbid lagoons, reef flats, and clear rocky- and coral reefs. They mostly feed on sponges. Note: we have no FPs of the family Zanclidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Striking underwater image. --Tagooty (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great shot, however categories were looking a bit sparse, I added a couple for you Poco a poco but it would be appreciated if you could add these ones in future underwater noms. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2025 at 16:24:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Scyphozoa
•  Info created by Mozzihh – uploaded by Mozzihh – nominated by Mozzihh -- Mozzihh (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Mozzihh (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment - Image looks good, but categorization is lacking. Is there nothing for the species (are they even identified)?  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I've fixed up the categories for you, please check them out so you can do it yourself the next time. The file name is borderline with little specifics and a bewildering number. --Cart (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for fixing! File name is from my archive... Mozzihh (talk) 19:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose While the jellies are very pretty and the rather too much black space in the photo can be cropped, I think the quality is too low, especially for an aquarium shot. Some might be salvaged by better editing from the raw (if such exists), but as it is now, I'm not too impressed. Sory. --Cart (talk) 18:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for the hints, I did some raw editing and cropping. I hope it's more impressing now. Mozzihh (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The crop is good for me, but the edit might unfortunately have made it worse. It's "blotchy" now. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 21:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Osmo Lundell hey 18:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Interesting subject but sorry, poor quality at full size (low detail and unsharp). Cmao20 (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2025 at 10:33:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info created by Osmo Lundell – uploaded by Osmo Lundell – nominated by Osmo Lundell --Osmo Lundell hey 10:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- --Osmo Lundell hey 10:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Gallery fixed. If a gallery link you make is red, then there is something wrong with it and you need to check it out. Go to the gallery pages and find the right one, plus the right section heading on that page and simply copy it. A little info about where this photo was taken, and is it wild or cultivated, should also be in the description and categories. Would you please add that. Best, --Cart (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I checked the diff, didn't notice the category was empty while posting from a mobile device. I'll add info of when the photo was taken soon. --Osmo Lundell hey 14:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Added details on where the photo was taken. Hatanpää mansion has a private owned garden that is open to the public in Tampere. Technical details on the camera body and lens aren't that important, atleast according to the policy, but I can provide them if someone is interested. The composition was edited in Lightroom. --Osmo Lundell hey 17:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Now we are getting somewhere, but the idea was that you should have added the place for the flower on the file page, not just here, since this page will be archived out of sight for most of the general public as soon as the nomination is over and the info will be lost. I've copied it for you and added the relevant categories too. A plant photo without a good location is almost useless for Commons, so please take a look at what I've done so you can do the same the next time. :)

  So since this was in a garden, I assume that the flower was planted and not wild. Or? In that case it should be in the 'Doronicum orientale (cultivars)' category and not the general category for the wild plants.

  Regarding info about the camera you used: Yes, we are very interested in the equipment used for a photo. We usually find that in the photos EXIF, but if you don't keep that with your photos you can also use the Template:Photo Information and add to the description on the file page. Having the tech specs is useful for people learning how to take good photos, and it also allows voters to see how well you have used the cameras capacity. That can be very useful when providing feedback on your photos and perhaps give hints and tips. I know this is a lot to take in for a "newbie", but this is the Big League for photos on Commons, so everything is the next level from just uploading photos for wikis. --Cart (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The plants in the garden were planted, yes. I took the exif and other metadata out, because there was too much info I didn't want to be there and stripping it straight out was easier than cherrypicking them out of the ~200 or so pics I took on that tour.
  It's not a lot to take at all! I'll go add the deets you asked. ^^ --Osmo Lundell hey 17:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you! Plant category fixed. --Cart (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Low quality (noise, halos/CA along the petal edges); not an appealing composition; missing EXIF. Overall, much below the bar of the many images in the FP Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry but I can see a lot of JPEG artefacts at full size and I am not sure I like how the harsh light means that the flowers just appear to be floating in mid air, it isn't a very satisfying composition for me. I think this picture is QI and was worth a try but I don't see it as FP. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 22:13:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
•  Info created by JayCubby – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good portrait of a notable individual -- JayCubby (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice. Why not making a JPEG version? --Yann (talk) 20:26, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Yann, fair point.  Done at File:Samuel Morse portrait.jpg. JayCubby (talk) 22:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 02:48, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 14:27:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Africa
•  Info Physical Map of Africa. Created by Tom Patterson – uploaded and nominated by Riad Salih (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment There are several mistakes regarding some names in Italy, that are reported in Italian (some of them with typoes), and not in English: Golfo di Cagliari --> Gulf of Cagliari; Golfo di Taranto --> Gulf of Taranto; Golfo di Salerno (Gulfo is a typo) --> Gulf of Salerno; Puglia --> Apulia; Isole Pelagie --> Pelagie Islands; Calabriaa (typo) --> Calabria.
  The capes are named in Italian, but this can be ok (Capo Spartivento, Capo Rizzuto, Capo Passero and Capo Santa Maria di Leuca), since there are other in northern Africa that are in French; otherwise, you may use Cape Spartivento, Cape Rizzuto (not frequent), Cape Passero, and Cape Santa Maria di Leuca. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  If someone is able to open the source file in Adobe Illustrator, they might be able to correct those inaccuracies. Riad Salih (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I used to have an Adobe Illustrator license, but do not have it anymore (using Inkscape instead; unfortunately Inkscape cannot convert this AI file). If somebody still has a license, could they please download the AI file and convert it to SVG format. First, because SVG is an open standard for vector graphics and can be uploaded directly to Commons; second, because then we could easily fix any typos etc. Of course the fonts are a problem; the map uses a proprietary font family (Myriad Pro), to allow the community to edit the file we would have to replace it by a font family which is available under a free (libre) license, preferably under OFL. If somebody could convert the file to a valid SVG, I would try to replace the fonts and to fix the typos. – Aristeas (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Could you please transfer some data from the source to the file page on Commons, such as how and when the map was made. Even physical features change with time. --Cart (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I did Riad Salih (talk) 14:05, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment The source website offers two versions: the medium-quality and the high-quality file. This is the medium-quality version. But IMHO we should use the high-quality file because it allows for much more possible use cases. It’s exactly the same image, just in higher resolution. (One can always downscale a raster image, but upscaling it is much more difficult and problematic.) No problem, we can simply upload it over the current (medium-quality) image. Please do so. – Aristeas (talk) 13:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Aristeas I attempted to open and upload the high quality file, but my internet speed and PC capabilities are somewhat limited. Please feel free to upload the high version if you can. Riad Salih (talk) 14:01, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Done Uploaded the high-quality file. Looking at the Exif data they say that the image uses “uncalibrated” colours; this means normally that the file uses the Adobe RGB color space, but the profile was not embedded, this causes wrong display (too muted colours). I have embedded the AdobeRGB profile with ExifTool, i.e. without any quality loss. Now the colours look a bit different, but IMHO quite reasonable and more like in common physical maps. – Aristeas (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 11:27:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
•  Info Willistead Manor, a manor house in Windsor, Ontario, designed by Albert Kahn for the Walker family. This 36-room house, completed in 1906, is in the Tudor-Jacobean style. All by Crisco 1492 --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Kritzolina 14:46, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment I like it. Lifting the shadows a bit would be an improvement, though. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Frank Schulenburg, I've increased the shadows by another 35. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Much better. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Well done, the more so since my firm is presently working on one of Kahn's industrial buildings, this is quite a contrast. Acroterion (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 08:03:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
  male white-booted racket-tail
• 
  female white-booted racket-tail

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
•  Info These white-booted hummingbirds live to the west of the Andes in Ecuador. 250km away, on the east of the Andes, the male and female racket-tails have orange boots. No FPs of the genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support. I like the action. @Charlesjsharp: , the denoise software left 'hot pixel'-esque things, I've marked them here. JayCubby (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, again. Two new versions uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Tkarcher (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good pair of images. --Tagooty (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Indeed, and we must especially appreciate that these photos were taken without flash etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Too much Topaz for my taste, e.g. the legs of the second picture look unnatural due to excesive sharpening Poco a poco (talk) 17:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Request I agree with Poco's assessment. In its current state, the images appears to have undergone quite heavy processing - possibly involving strong noise reduction followed by sharpening. As a result, some details seem unnaturally emphasized, and parts of the image take on a slightly harsh or fragmented appearance. If reprocessing is an option and not too much effort, a more balanced development could preserve the many strengths of this set. That way, the nomination might still succeed - and we would gain two new, excellent featured pictures. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

new version of the female uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support for the set. Thank you for the updated version. The texture now appears more natural and balanced. I appreciate the quick revision and am happy to support the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 06:28:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
•  Info The church was built in 1897 and the bell towers added in 1918. Note: There is an FP of this church, a significantly different view than this nomination. No other FPs of church exteriors in India. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A tough shot to get right Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral The white on white is very well handled, but sorry I'm not a fan of that top-heavy, distorted look you get when photographing such tall buildings in close proximity. Some buildings are just impossible to get a full clean photo of that really works. --Cart (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support imposing structure, well-captured. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2025 at 01:42:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info Madam Marie's Temple of Knowledge on the boardwalk at Asbury Park, New Jersey. Marie Castello was mentioned in 4th of July, Asbury Park (Sandy) by Bruce Springsteen:

"Well the cops finally busted Madam Marie

For tellin' fortunes better than they do"

created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --XRay 💬 06:12, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Simple lines, shot well, with an interesting history. Works for me! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support as per Chris Woodrich. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Love the beautiful contrast between the blue shades (Madam Marie’s, sky) and the yellow/orange shades (left and right buildings). The colour palette, the austere composition and the meaningful emptiness remind me of some paintings by Giorgio de Chirio and Edward Hopper – Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Aristeas. --Cart (talk) 11:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2025 at 20:39:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lutjanidae (Snappers)
•  Info Mexican barred snapper (Hoplopagrus guentherii), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, Mexico. It is native to the eastern Pacific Ocean and attains a maximum total length of 92 centimetres (36 in), although 50 centimetres (20 in) is more typical, and the maximum published weight is 9.6 kg (21 lb). It emerges at night from their day shelters in caves and crevices to hunt during the night other fishes and crustaceans. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Hoplopagrus. c/n/u by Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent portrait Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Another great underwater image --Tagooty (talk) 06:30, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support as per Acroterion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2025 at 14:56:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
•  Info created by – uploaded by Edelmauswaldgeist – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 14:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 14:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment File name fixed Ezarateesteban

That's all well, but re-naming a file during a nom isn't quite as easy as just moving the file page and nom page. You must also take care of the code in the nom or you will create a mess. I've fixed that for you now, please remember that in the future or better still be sure all is ok before you make the nom. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Pretty painting but visibly tilted canvas and detail of brushstrokes is a long way off FP. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed tilted canvas --Ezarateesteban 20:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but clearly still strongly tilted. Cmao20 (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose - Per Cmao20 on tilt and detail. In addition, the asymmetric cropping of the frame further emphasizes the tilt of the image and distracts from the painting. - ERcheck (talk) 00:36, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment: This painting by Flemish artist Paul Bril is in the collection of the Gemäldegalerie art museum in Berlin. The digital museum site has an image of this painting here. There is a significant hue shift between the two images. (Note the linked image is CC BY 4.0). - ERcheck (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2025 at 10:11:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Viperidae (Vipers)
•  Info No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support More exact location cat added. Cart (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:17, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:46, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:13, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2025 at 19:56:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
•  Info created and uploaded by Inge Prommersberger – nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This is the winner of WLF Germany. The night action shot convinced the jury with its high quality that I agree deserves to be counted among the best pictures on our site -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment It's a stunning photo of really good quality, but the name is too ambiguous/could mean any number of things and the categories needs some work. I've fixed up and corrected the 'en' part of the description, perhaps someone fluent in German can match the 'de' part. --Cart (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment Good points, Cart. IMHO most of this is done now – Kritzolina started with the categories, you (Cart) have improved categories and ‘en’ description, Cmao20 has added the German version, Radomianin has added helpful links (many thanks to all of you!) and yours truly has tried to improve the filename. Have we missed something? – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, almost there, 'Devil costumes of Germany' is more accurate and as usual the "when" was missing. I've fixed that. --Cart (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all so very much. This kind of cooperation is what makes the Wikimedia projects special. You all made me very happy this morning! Kritzolina (talk) 08:07, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --XRay 💬 09:24, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Impressive photo and well-deserved competition winner. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Stunning! - ERcheck (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Obviously. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Acroterion (talk) 01:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --BigDom (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:16, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Jakubhal 03:45, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2025 at 15:28:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
•  Info No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo - amateur astrophotography from a user with a Commons account. created by Cpayoub – uploaded by Cpayoub – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - ERcheck (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great wow-factor! Took a while for me to sort out the categories (and do a little digging online) since the Astronomy cats don't really reflect the brilliant minds behind photos such as this. With all the photos taken from various telescopes on Earth, space telescopes, astronauts in orbit, whatever, I think it's important to know a little bit about where a photo was created, not just the equipment used. --Cart (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you Cart, I'll use this as reference in future. In previous nominations of Chuck's astrophotography the pictures were only categorised with the name of the nebula, so I thought that was enough. This looks better though. Cmao20 (talk) 21:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks! I set up a category for him, so it might be easier to sort his photos in the future. Ideally the number of the nebula should have been included in the title (those numbers are like the latin names for species) since these astronomical objects often go by many name even within one language, but we'll start slowly here. ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• File will be renamed to include correct catalogue number when nomination is finished. Cmao20 (talk) 19:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great work for amateur astrophotography. Yann (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very beautiful and excellent quality (e.g. no coma, not even in the corners!). – Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --XRay 💬 06:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2025 at 15:28:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
•  Info No FPs of this place - just thought it was a really nice composition. created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Good angle of this stately building. --Tagooty (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Name is a bit general, but it's a great view of the main building and the park. --Cart (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:02, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Thanks for the nomination --Llez (talk) 06:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Having grown up in the Schlossgarten (well, at least I played there every other day until I started primary school ;–), I must support this ;–). Seriously, it’s a very good and representative photo of this place. – Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К 14:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:16, 16 June 2025 (UTC)