Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

• Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.

Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.

• Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.

• Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.

• Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.

• Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.

• Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.

• Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
  • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
  • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
  • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

• Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.

• Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.

• Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.

• Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

• Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.

• Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.

• Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.

• Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.

• Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.

• Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.

• Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.

Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.

• Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.

Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.

Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

• {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
• {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
• {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
• {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
• {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
• {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

• {{Keep}}  Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
• {{Delist}}  Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:

In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

• Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
• Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
• Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
   oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
   1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
   2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

• Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
• Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
• Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
• Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

• Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder
• Kritiken von Fotografien

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2025 at 15:24:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
•  Info created and uploaded by Christopher Michel (see also Christopher Michel), nominated by Yann
•  Info Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, in 2012.
•  Support World famous personality, Nobel Peace Prize in 1989, by a notable photographer. -- Yann (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A very good portrait. Too bad it isn't already featured because it would have been the better option for his 90th birth anniversary POTD. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:36, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Looking at this one feels the opposite than here. A shame, because the quality is just not there to make it featured. Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2025 at 14:20:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#India
•  Info created and uploaded by Alexander Savin – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent colours, satisfying composition, good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Really nice. Reminds me of Portra 400. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2025 at 11:07:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Papilionidae#Genus : Papilio
•  Info created by Sonam Wangchuk Lepcha – uploaded by Sonam Wangchuk Lepcha – nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Nice composition but this time the wings are too unsharp for me to consider it one of the best on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2025 at 10:33:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Argynnis
•  Info created by MaheshBaruahwildlife – uploaded by MaheshBaruahwildlife – nominated by Sandipoutsider -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Sandipoutsider (talk) 10:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Slightly shallow depth of field but still FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2025 at 06:57:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
•  Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, nothing really wrong with it but the composition and light are not outstanding for FP in my opinion. I think we may need a less vague image title too, I know that's the name of the village but it isn't obvious to anyone who doesn't know Greek geography Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You have no idea how difficult it is to take a good photo of this location under good lighting conditions. It's very rare that lighting conditions like those shown in the nominated image exist. Usually, there's fog or dust in the atmosphere. Since you're rejecting the photo anyway, I won't ask for a file renaming. Thanks. Petro Stelte (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment Hello, Petro Stelte, and welcome to FPC. I can understand frustration at a negative review on your first nomination (though, trust me, negative reviews are most often the case for first nominations and negative reviews are also essential for keeping FPs outstanding) but it is always a good idea to respond politely to good faith critique. As for the image, I agree with Cmao20 regarding the composition and I also think the left crop is a bit tight. But as a good quality documentation of what seems to be a site of some importance, with sufficient detail, I offer  Weak support. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:35, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi. Thanks for your support. Yes, this is a very important historical site. I apologize for my rudeness. It wasn't intentional. Petro Stelte (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2025 at 21:20:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
•  Info created by Fedaro – uploaded by Fedaro – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support also Eeek! JayCubby (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, though the title could be more descriptive — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak support Very nice, there is though room for improvement, there is a spot on the antennae on the right and also a halo around it Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Chris. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2025 at 14:27:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Class : Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fish)
•  Info Greybar grunt (Haemulon sexfasciatum), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. Note: there is no FP on Commons of the whole order Acanthuriformes (including 30 families with snappers, bigeyes, rabbitfishes or tripletails). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I find the composition and light in this one really satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:42, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2025 at 05:27:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Maps
•  Info Created by the w:en:British Information Services, restored by Wilfredor – uploaded by Wilfredor – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Pristine restoration at high resolution -- JayCubby (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:28, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Interesting and educational. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This explains very well why India was colonized. --Yann (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment This map from 1944 is certainly not "created by Wilfredor" -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Basile Morin, fixed JayCubby (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per UnpetitroleX --Terragio67 (talk) 03:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 19:40:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Saudi Arabia
•  Info created by Saudi Press Agency – uploaded by ARABCREATOR7 – nominated by ARABCREATOR7 -- ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  CommentI would like to see a less dark / processed version of this photo. --Osmo Lundell hey 10:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose  Overprocessed and / or problem of management of the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Agree with Basile Morin. Good composition but very overprocessed, saturation and contrast is way too high. Cmao20 (talk) 10:47, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 18:50:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Pomacentridae (Clownfish and Damselfish)
•  Info Antler coral can grow to more than a metre in diameter. Research has shown that the coral is more likely to grow if it hosts a colony of blue damselfish. The coral offers the damselfish protection; the larger the coral, the better the protection. Blue damselfish are known as ‘interference competitors’. They chase other fish away, including some species that eat coral. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —  The iridescent blue damselfish swimming through the coral make it for me -- ERcheck (talk) 01:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 07:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support. @Charlesjsharp and CJS: , there is a grid-like noise pattern (maybe JPEG artifacts? the variety of image noise never ceases to amaze me), could you do anything about it? Otherwise, interesting scene. I like the how coral stands out from the surrounding aqueovegetation. JayCubby (talk) 19:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can't do anything till back in the UK Thursday. Topaz has done a grid on me before. Topaz was so much better 12 months ago. The new versions are flawed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Their customer support is fairly responsive, or so I've found. However, their attention appears to be on shiny new AI gimmicks (creative upscaling, etc). Enjoy your trip. JayCubby (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Stunning clarity of the water, appealing composition and satisfying DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wow, a really stunning effort. Cmao20 (talk) 10:46, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:38, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 18:31:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Tetraodontiformes
•  Info Spot-fin porcupinefish (Diodon hystrix), Cabo Pulmo, Baja California, Mexico. The spot-fin porcupinefish is a medium-sized fish which grows up to 91 centimetres (36 in), but the average size mostly observed is 40 centimetres (16 in). In case of danger, the porcupinefish can inflate itself by swallowing water to deter the potential predator with its larger volume and it can raise its spines. The porcupinefish concentrates tetrodotoxin (a strong neurotoxin that are destructive to nerve tissue) in certain parts of its body such as the liver, skin, gonads and the viscera. This defensive system constitutes an additional device to dissuade potential predators. The porcupinefish is circumglobal, found in tropical and subtropical waters. The porcupinefish's diet is based on sea urchins, gastropods, clams and crustaceans. This fish is solitary, except during mating periods, and it has a nocturnal activity with a maximal activity at sunset and sunrise. Note: surprisingly there are no FPs of the family Diodontidae (blowfishes, also know as balloonfishes or globefishes) on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:52, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:08, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 14:46:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
•  Info created by Gzen92 – uploaded by Gzen92 – nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, but I can hardly see the bell tower, therefore I'm not even sure what is the main subject here. Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Hidden subject in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry, nice idea but I'm sure there is a better way to overlap the beautiful trees with the bell tower itself in a way that doesn't look cluttered and result in the two parts of the composition clashing so much. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 14:12:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States
•  Info A nighttime view of the Detroit Financial District from Windsor, Ontario, covering the waterfront from the Detroit Princess to the Coleman A. Young Municipal Centre. This would be our first cityscape from Michigan. All by Crisco 1492 --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Again, I've added countries. Too many nominators here are so convinced that every person in the world knows in what country their towns are. Readers should not need to backtrack through the categories to get that info. I'm a fairly well educated European, but I don't know all the names of Canada's provinces, cities, or US states, cities and exactly where they are on a map. Just as I know US and Canadian folks have the same trouble with our cities and countries. (And don't get any of us started on African geography...) To really get what makes this photo so awesome, it's good to have full info in the description. Commons is a world-wide site. --Cart (talk) 15:45, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Carter. I have expanded the description on the file page.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thank You! --Cart (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support Very nice. You have an odd "blotch" on the Fort Pontchartrain building. I'll see if I can leave a note. I'm sure, you'll fix that. --Cart (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Huh, interesting shape. I'll fix it when I get home from my appointment. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose I don't have really anything to object, the shot is fine with a plus for night photography, but I still miss something here. I don't see what makes this landscape special Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Satisfying composition and well-managed light Cmao20 (talk) 10:43, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20 --Terragio67 (talk) 03:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 03:50, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2025 at 04:42:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
•  Info S-charl, wild feeding place beautifully situated in nature above the mountain village of S-charl towards Alp Sesvenna at 1850 meters above sea level.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 13:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support A special building with nice autumn wood. – Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 19:13:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
•  Info Hindu temple dedicated to Shirgul Maharaj, at an elevation of 3,455 metres (11,335 ft) near the Churdhar peak in Himachal, India. It is constructed in the Kath Kuni style of Himachali vernacular architecture. Created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice light and special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:29, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile. Aristeas (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Basile, lovely shot in a special place. --Terragio67 (talk) 03:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 03:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 16:50:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
•  Info The Chapel of the Maccabees, also known as the Notre-Dame collegial chapel, was transformed into a storage facility for salt and gunpowder during the Reformation, however, by the close of the 17th century, it served as the location for philosophical lectures held by the Academy, an early form of Geneva University. Currently, it is one of the most visited tourist-cultural places in Geneva, guests can participate in concerts hosted in this historic venue and it is also utilized for weddings and family events. The stained glass windows in the Chapel of the Maccabees in Geneva, are attributed to the workshop of Janin Loyel, dating back to around 1460. Created – uploaded – nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment Added date category + country, People shouldn't have to backtrack through categories to see where this is. This is the most common mistake nominators do. Not everyone knows the geography of every country. Also copied the nice text from this page to the file page. If you have interesting things like this to tell, add them to the file page. This nom will be archived and almost invisible after the nom is closed. --Cart (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very well done. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:38, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose Quality is fine but the result of the top crop is an unbalanced image, the crop is fine at the bottom but too tight at the top, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment @Poco a poco, @Chris Woodrich, @UnpetitproleX, @Yann, @Cart, following a fair criticism the image underwent a slight modification. Thanks Diego, luckily I still have enough pixels at the top, and by adding them the main scene depicted rightly takes the center of the image. So I do not present an alternative, but I modified the current image to not have two identical images on Wikimedia. -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:34, 01 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Weak oppose The image is in cropped form.-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 07:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello E.IMAN, the purpose of this picture is to show in detail the central part or the main window's scene depicted and not the entire window. For this reason I added the suffix "Details" in the jpg image name. Kind regards. Terragio67 (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Unsatisfying composition in my view, because the top seems awkwardly cropped. Both this version and the previous one (that was slightly better, unfortunately) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:32, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Interesting debate. For me it's fine to focus only on the bottom of this window, which depicts a complete scene in itself. Cmao20 (talk) 10:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Cmao20. Please consider that this is one of the few photos of stained-glass windows which also show the context = the surrounding reveal and walls with reasonable brightness and quality; that’s a big plus – most old-style photos of stained glass just show black around the window panes. – Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 03:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 16:27:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
•  Info - A-10 Thunderbolt II formation flight over Wake Island. Striking turquoise color from the Wake Island lagoon below has a nice contrast to the blue ocean/skies. -- created by Audree Campbell, USAF – uploaded & nominated by ERcheck - corrections by Cart – ERcheck (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – ERcheck (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 10:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- E.IMAN^COMMONS 10:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ezarateesteban 14:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice POV photo. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:56, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 03:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 16:19:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
•  Info created by H. Morgillo – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 16:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 16:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, though I'd credit H. Morgillo of New York on the information page (lower left corner of the poster). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, and if we don't know the date of death of H. Morgillo, we should not use {{PD-old-70}}. Yann (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Do you suggest use {{PD-old-auto}} ? --Ezarateesteban 18:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not either, but PD-old is not necessary here. {{PD-US-expired}} is sufficient. Yann (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Ezarateesteban 19:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:26, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 15:17:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Muricidae
•  Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ermell (talk) 06:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support-- E.IMAN^COMMONS 07:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:57, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Petro Stelte (talk) 08:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 02:53, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 13:32:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Hestinalis
•  Info created by Atanu Bose Photography – uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Some of the antenna is unsharp, but excellent otherwise. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support For the premiere in the genus Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 02:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2025 at 13:21:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Charaxes
•  Info created by Atanu Bose Photography – uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Moderate support Depth of field is a bit shallow (some of the nearside wing is unsharp) but still a good photo of a beautiful butterfly. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 15:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose There is already a very similar FP of this species, and from the same author. Poco a poco (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2025 at 21:48:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Ukraine#Donetsk Oblast
•  Info Beautiful Ukrainian landscape from a protected nature reserve. No FPs of this place. created by Balkhovitin – uploaded by Balkhovitin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 10:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Excellent. --XRay 💬 10:34, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Cart (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 06:24, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 02:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2025 at 21:48:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Switzerland
•  Info I really like the light and colours in this image of a Swiss church. No FPs of this place. created by JoachimKohler-HB – uploaded by JoachimKohler-HB – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 10:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral Hmm. Shadows in front of the church, parked car in front of the church, only partially visible gravestones. All together a bit too much for an excellent picture. --XRay 💬 10:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I honestly really like the shadows and think they add depth, but I'll admit the car is a flaw. Thanks for the review anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Weak oppose I think that I could live with the shadows but the bottom crop looks isn't really good and spoils the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very good perspective, light and colours. It’s more or less impossible to avoid cropping the gravestones, one could only avoid this with a different point of view, but that would probably result in a less impressive perspective. Therefore IMHO the only sensible critique is about the car; but it’s not too prominent, so OK. – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2025 at 17:46:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
•  Info This is my version of Edward Hopper's Nighthawks. We passed by this ice cream stand and I turned around and grabbed my wife's camera and shot it before the scene could change. I have edited out a diagonal guy wire and a couple of background lights --created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Acroterion (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Interesting concept! I also like how it's the older branding, rather than the huge DQ signs they use in most places. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 18:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Ezarateesteban
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• May want to redo the removal of the wire that crossed in front of the stand -- looks like it pretty significantly altered that pumpkin pie blizzard poster. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll see what I can do. It ran through a pie slice(?) and what might be a bowl. Acroterion (talk) 23:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I've recreated the pie slice credibly and fixed the cup edge in the poster. I will not attempt to recreate what I think is the word "pie" in the corner. It's about the best I can do without making things up or editing beyond what is actually resolved - it's almost down to individual pixels at that level of zoom ~800%. Acroterion (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• You had me at credible pie. :)  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  03:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --XRay 💬 10:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support At first I hummed a bit about including the trash bin, but when I noticed it was perfectly bookended by another, it works. Hopper is always a good inspiration. --Cart (talk) 11:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Llez (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Kudos, really impressive photographic variation of Hopper’s sujet, even with similar colours. – Aristeas (talk) 13:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Terragio67 (talk) 02:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2025 at 17:46:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Africa
•  Info Map of Algeria divided by tribes in 1846 created by Ernest Warnier and Carette Auguste – uploaded and nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support High resolution. But shouldn't it be converted to jpg? Support regardless, but would prefer jpg. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Is there a way to do it without uploading a new version? Riad Salih (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. Different file formats can only be uploaded separately. Yann (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very detailed and interesting map, high documentary value; reproduction is not perfect, but very good. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[