Hi, I have seen that you consider that the listing of short term rental apartaments does not comply with the policy of Wikivoyage for Bucharest. I find that hard to grasp, because since we started the business, 6 years ago, many foreigners who came in Bucharest to work or to travel, and have chosen to use our services ( and other companies as well ) really appreciated they could use this type of accommodation while they were here. This is really a very comptetitive way of reducing your costs and increase the comfort while visiting Bucharest ( short or long term ). Isn't this what every traveller wants ? - to visit a place, but do it while they minimize their expenses ? If this Bucharest page on Wikivoyage wouldn't have a section for accommodation, I wouldn't mind your refusal to allow this listing. But not accepting it, while allowing other types of accommodation businesses show up here, seem like discrimination to me and it is against the spirit of this project. I asked you the question if you've ever been to Bucharest and used this type of services and it seems it was hard to answer it.

We have a lot of big companies ( multinationals) that use our services and this idustry is very developed in Bucharest. If you look at our website you will see that we have a big portofolio. Does this ring a bell ? If you continue to unlist this type of accommodation, I think the one that should be blacklisted should be you not the companies that try to list themselves here.

Please think about it and allow the listing, to be able to let the people that enter this site to have a complete list of choices when it comes to Bucharest accommodation.

Best regards !

I've responded to you at Talk:Bucharest#Short term rental apartaments in Bucharest - clarifications. In the future, please keep discussions in one place instead of copying them to three separate places. -- (WT-en) Ryan • (talk) • 12:00, 10 June 2010 (EDT)

Jan was acting entirely within Wikivoyage policiy removing your listing - See Apt for more details, and no need for hyperbolic language here, we deal with that way to often to take the bate I'm affraid --(WT-en) Stefan (sertmann) ^talk 16:04, 9 June 2010 (EDT)