Latest comment: 9 years ago by Hobbitschuster in topic redirect instead


redirect instead

[edit]

Do we actually need this article? Shouldn't we redirect this speck on the map instead? Hobbitschuster (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't know. This article lacks any content. Is there anything to see or do, anyplace to eat or sleep in Redford? Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't know. Chances are, there isn't. Given its population and the fact that nobody saw fit to add anything to that effect. (not even a tout) Hobbitschuster (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
WP has nothing to report about this place beyond the usual w:user:Rambot spam, and likely only has that because this is a census-designated place. I have no idea why this page was created. K7L (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Besides if and when there should ever arise a need for such an article, we can always recreate it. How long should we wait until we redirect (provided nobody disagrees)? Hobbitschuster (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
"Redford, New York tourism bureau" produced no relevant result. You can probably go ahead and redirect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I will do so. It can of course always be reverted if the need should arise. Hobbitschuster (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply