Is this article going to be developed further?

[edit]

This article isn't very useful at all. If there is no plan to expand it, we should figure out what to do with it. Ground Zero (talk) 01:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

You’re right that the article was limited, but the OpenStreetMap trail data needed fixing first before it could really be expanded. That’s now been done, so there’s more to work with. In general, if something seems lacking, edits are always appreciated. Jpolvto (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
As an aside here, the most important thing that needs improvement for hiking trails on Wikivoyage is the OSM integration. The relation in OSM has a lot (most) of the points of interest. It's a bit of a chore to add them twice. Not sure where I should lobby for this. Jpolvto (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
It looks like the POI thing might be complicated. Proper rendering of geolines shouldn't be.
One thing I noticed on the German Wikivoyage is the introduction of additional symbols. This could really benefit hiking trails as well. Might make a user story for that. 4720d877-0865-4bdc-99b8-1443ac9f93a6 (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply