Latest comment: 7 years ago by Emmette Hernandez Coleman in topic Should we (implicitly) recognize claims on Antarctica?


Should we (implicitly) recognize claims on Antarctica?

[edit]

By creating redirects such as this one? Hobbitschuster (talk) 12:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Should we implicitly recognize unrecognized states by having articles such as Nagorno-Karabakh? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
That's not the point, as I made clear in the pub. Nagorno-Karabakh has de facto control over its territory and you'd need their permits and visas to get there. For Antarctic claims the situation seems to be a bit more complicated. If I read the Antarctica article correctly, you'll basically have to deal with each base individually... And there are bases of different countries in different parts... Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Actuality, I saw this before I saw what you posted at the pub. But let's have this conversation at the pup, no point in spreading it across multiple pages. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply