21 December 2018

• 01:5901:59, 21 December 2018 diff hist +122 Antarctica →Regions: A more meaningful classification for a traveler, South Pole requires very different plans and has different tour options than say, people going to antarctic peninsula Tag: Visual edit
• 01:3101:31, 21 December 2018 diff hist +53 Antarctica →Regions: Lump antarctic islands with antarctic peninsula with a note that the majority (and not all) of islands are next to the peninsula Tag: Visual edit
• 01:2801:28, 21 December 2018 diff hist +116 Antarctica →Regions: Classify antarctica based on entry points, i.e. someone taking an antarctic journey from new zealand won't visit antarctic peninsula Tag: Visual edit
• 01:2501:25, 21 December 2018 diff hist +527 Talk:Antarctica →Where to breadcrumb islands just off the antarctic peninsula: the new classification makes zero sense for someone trying to tour antarctica.. why the heck would a tourist want to visit only islands and exclude antarctic peninsula or vice versa. This is not a correct classification for voyagers. Hobbitschuster point is correct, it should be based on entry points or packages to antarctica
• 01:2301:23, 21 December 2018 diff hist +527 Talk:Antarctica →Static map replacement: this makes no sense on wikivoyage
• 01:1701:17, 21 December 2018 diff hist −328 Antarctica →Regions: The new classification makes zero sense, especially after you click into the Antarctic Peninsula link. A lot of stations are location on King George Island and the majority of tourists that go to the Antarctic Peninsula would pass by the islands (remember, after all, this is a tourist wiki not a geography website) Tag: Visual edit