Viewing abuse filter 35: Unregistered or New user blanking someone else's user or user talk page

Editing filter 35

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	35
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 682 actions, this filter has matched 0 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.17 ms, and it consumes 1.4 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:	!("autoconfirmed" in user_groups \| global_user_editcount > 500) & page_namespace rlike "^(2\|3)$" & old_size > 500 & (new_size < 267 \| edit_delta < -600 ) & action == "edit" & !(page_title rlike user_name & user_type == "named") & ( !added_lines irlike "^#\sredirect\s\[\[" ) !("autoconfirmed" in user_groups \| global_user_editcount > 500) & page_namespace rlike "^(2\|3)$" & old_size > 500 & (new_size < 267 \| edit_delta < -600 ) & action == "edit" & !(page_title rlike user_name & user_type == "named") & ( !added_lines irlike "^#\sredirect\s\[\[" )
Notes:	based on filter 34 from wikipedia I'm thinking we should change the criteria from 25 edits to just being autoconfirmed. With the new autoconfirmed requirements, being stricter (cf previous 0 edits), what's the downside of changing "user_editcount < 25" to "!"autoconfirmed" in user_groups"? //shb2000 Nov 14, 2024 The change of "!contains_any(article_text, "/", user_name)" to "…page_title…" is a functional change, seems like one better targetting pruning of e.g. user sandboxes. I support using the standard autoconfirmed instead of an arbitrary edit count, making the change now. I also change the requirement of having the username in some of the removed lines to the requirement that its actually their own user(sub)page or -talkpage. –LPfi 2024-11-14 Thanks – it made much more sense then but now we have a clear defined criteria so it makes much more sense to use this. //shb 2024-11-14 I now added global_user_count > 500 as a criterium parallel with autoconfirmed, see filter 2 for discussion. –LPfi 2024-11-15
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	09:30, 15 November 2024 by LPfi (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"!(\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups \| global_user_editcount \u003E 500) \u0026 \r\npage_namespace rlike \"^(2\|3)$\" \u0026\r\nold_size \u003E 500 \u0026 (new_size \u003C 267 \| edit_delta \u003C -600 ) \u0026\r\naction == \"edit\" \u0026\r\n!(page_title rlike user_name \u0026 user_type == \"named\") \u0026\r\n( \r\n !added_lines irlike \"^#\\sredirect\\s\\[\\[\"\r\n)","name":"Unregistered or New user blanking someone else's user or user talk page","comments":"based on filter 34 from wikipedia\r\n\r\nI'm thinking we should change the criteria from 25 edits to just being autoconfirmed. With the new autoconfirmed requirements, being stricter (cf previous 0 edits), what's the downside of changing \"user_editcount \u003C 25\" to \"!\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups\"? //shb2000 Nov 14, 2024\r\n\r\nThe change of \"!contains_any(article_text, \"/\", user_name)\" to \"\u2026page_title\u2026\" is a functional change, seems like one better targetting pruning of e.g. user sandboxes. I support using the standard autoconfirmed instead of an arbitrary edit count, making the change now. I also change the requirement of having the username in some of the removed lines to the requirement that its actually their own user(sub)page or -talkpage. \u2013LPfi 2024-11-14\r\n\r\nThanks \u2013 it made much more sense then but now we have a clear defined criteria so it makes much more sense to use this. //shb 2024-11-14\r\n\r\nI now added global_user_count \u003E 500 as a criterium parallel with autoconfirmed, see filter 2 for discussion. \u2013LPfi 2024-11-15","group":"default","actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"],"tag":["blanking"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"],"tag":["blanking"]}}